The barrister who represented ISIS bride Shamima Begum before secret anti-terror hearings has quit, accusing ministers of ‘neglecting’ the process.
Angus McCullough KC has acted for the 24-year-old as she attempts to win back her British citizenship, which was stripped when she fled to join ISIS aged 15 in 2015.
He has served as her special advocate – a term used to describe a barrister who represents a client in proceedings where information is being kept secret from them.
Under the system, the special advocate cannot speak to the client – or the client’s usual lawyer – after seeing the evidence due to national security concerns.
Mr McCollough said the ‘unfairness’ of secret hearings was ‘being aggravated by sustained neglect of the special advocate system’.

Angus McCullough KC has acted for the 24-year-old as she attempts to win back her British citizenship, which was stripped when she fled to join ISIS aged 15 in 2015
He also warned over rules preventing special advocates from being able to contact their clients once evidence had been put before the court.
Mr McCullough said the ‘basic principles of fairness and the rule of law require the unfairness associated with closed material proceedings to be minimised’.
The KC criticised ministers for not responding to an independent review of the system by Sir Duncan Ouseley, a retired High Court judge.
He wrote: ‘[Sir Duncan] made 20 recommendations in relation to steps to improve the operation of CMPs. None of these appears controversial in principle.’
Ms Begum has claimed to be a victim of human trafficking when she left the UK to join ISIS in Syria.
At the Court of Appeal in London last month, her lawyers began a bid to overturn the decision to deprive her of her British citizenship, with the Home Office opposing the challenge.
Three senior judges were told the Home Office failed to consider the legal duties owed to Ms Begum as a potential victim of trafficking or as a result of ‘state failures’ in her case.

Ms Begum has claimed to be a victim of human trafficking when she left the UK to join ISIS in Syria
Samantha Knights KC said in written submissions: ‘The appellant’s trafficking was a mandatory, relevant consideration in determining whether it was conducive to the public good and proportionate to deprive her of citizenship, but it was not considered by the Home Office.
‘As a consequence, the deprivation decision was unlawful.’
Earlier this year, Ms Begum lost a challenge at the Special Immigration Appeals Commission (SIAC).
Source: | This article originally belongs to Dailymail.co.uk